Distorted Picture should have been a better choice for a title.
I am not privy to Silk Smitha’s personal life or for that matter, not really aware of what exactly happened to her in the last few years of her stormy career as a seductress on screen. But can say with fair amount of certainty that what one gets to see in Dirty Picture is a somewhat grotesque distortion of her volatile life. As someone very passionately involved with Tamil films in the 80s and 90s my knowledge of the times and lives of many personalities of those times can be trusted for reasonably good reporting!!!
Firstly, there is this tendency to consider everyone south of Bhopal as a Madraasi. And the director of Dirty Picture is no exception. The four states of Southern India have fairly unique and distinct cultural lineage and even the languages are as similar as chalk and cheese. The south indian film industry had its nerve centre in Madras those days and therefore served as a veritable attraction point to every aspirant. And the industry was and is dominated by Telugu and Malayalam speaking people. Call it talent or beauty but that’s a reality. There was a time when tamil film music did not have one singer with Tamil as mother tongue.
Silk Smitha hailed from Eluru in AP and spent her early years there. For someone exploited in early-life, it may have been a painless passage into the vamp like overtly sexy roles that she was required to perform on screen. She may not have had many credits as the leading lady of a film while she would be the central action due to her bold performances in almost all the movies she acted. Was ok as a dancer and tolerable as a seducer. Maybe it was paucity of such talent that made her successful. As a school boy, I too suffered those unavoidable crushes but it was hardly remembered as I grew.
Coming to the movie, Vidya does a neat job. Or she does her best to live that role – but it is often like that unpopular MF Hussain’s portrayal of Hindu Goddesses. However voyeuristic you try to become while depicting these deities, the beauty cannot be removed. Vidya’s natural beauty is a drag on the vamp like portrayal required for a movie like this. One is intuitively drawn towards that sterling performance by Kangana Raut in Madhur Bhandarkar’s Fashion (in my opinion one of the finest movies of the last decade). Vidya’s acting in the last 20 minutes is quite brilliant (yes she acts and not ‘lives’) and it is amazing how she could transform her physical built to adapt to the needs of the role.
The film-shots shown in the first half have that flavor and richness (sic) of the Telugu movies where we got to see the Krishnas/NTRs/ANRs dancing with young belles (who were the heroines in which Silk was only a cabaret dancer for one song in villain’s den) against a backdrop of riotous Holi like explosions. The settings seen in the few duet songs were all part of the Telugu films – but quite popular and appealing those days. And Silk had nothing to do with these dance and songs. The director was mis-directed presumably.
Re-recording and cinematography are mediocre and sometimes a pain. BGS is somewhat reflective and misses the theme totally. Shah does a neat job – and this is the only area where the director excels in highlighting how the plus-70 heroes were a dominant force among minus-18 heroines.
Overall, not a movie that would have mattered if I missed it. Maybe if we didn’t have a Silk Smitha in real life, this movie may have looked different.